Blog - c++

segfaultlabs.com » Blog » c++

GCC and functions name mangling

Mateusz Małczak2007-03-08asm, c++comments

my latest discovery is that gcc in linux does not prepend underscore at the beginning of the names of funcitons, while windows port of gcc compiler does that.

cygwin : gcc -S ble.c 
_main:
        pushl   %ebp
...
 linux : gcc -S ble.c 
main:
        pushl   %ebp
...
we can force gcc to add underscore using -fleading-underscore option, but this isnt good solution (try it yourself, or read gcc manual).

absence of underscore at the beginning of the name is important when you are trying to use code written and compiled under windows with gcc, or when you write assembler code and compile it with NASM (like in my previous post), this is also way how ive discovered this :) to use function that had been written in assembler and compiled with NASM in my c code (gcc in cygwin, borland) i had to declare it (in asm source) with underscoped name. because both gcc in cygwin and borland expects functions written in c to be preceded with underscore. but when i've tried to compile the same code with gcc under linux i got linker error (underscore)

to use the same assembler code in windows and linux i had to declare function with leading underscore (in linux), or to use asm() keyword to specify the name to be used in asm code (gcc manual page 281). i think, the best solution is to add defines so that functions can be imported properly (with underscore) but used in code without it.

GCC under linux by default does not add prepend uderscore at the beginning of the function name.

Assembly code in GNU g++

Mateusz Małczak2007-03-05asm, c++comments

First of all GNU compilers use AT&T assembly syntax, not Intel. Secondly writing inline assembly isnt easy thing to do, especially when you are familiar only with intel syntax. when you need to write function using assembly (for example for complex numbers calculations) there is a better solution, when using inline assembly. As an example i will show sqr function to calculate double number to the power of 2. Assembler code can be seen below, note that doubles are returned via fpu stack 

section .text use32
        global _sqr
_sqr:
        push    ebp
        mov     ebp,esp
        fld     qword [ebp+08h]
        fmul    to st0
        pop     ebp
        ret
assuming that we have saved this code in file fpu.asm, we can compile it using NASM as follows
nasm -f coff fp u.asm (in cygwin)
nasm -f elf fpu.asm (in linux)
this was the first part.. the second is to create code in c++ using our external sqr function, for example: 
#include <stdio.h>
 
extern "C"
{
   cpx tst1( const cpx c );
}
 
int main()
{
  double d = 2.0;
  printf("%f %f",d,sqr(d));
  return 0;
}
to compile this code using g++ compiler we need to pass previously compiled assembler code to the linker.
g++ fpu.o tst.cpp

C++ class in assembler

Mateusz Małczak2007-03-02asm, c++comments

#include <cstdio>
class baseObj
{
public :
  int i;
  baseObj(int o)  { i = o + 32; };
};
 
class childObj : public baseObj
{
public :
  childObj(int i):baseObj(i){}
};
 
int main()
{
  baseObj a = childObj(16);
  a.i += 64;
  printf("go %d",a.i);
};
i was expecting (in the time when i was writing this code) compiler to create two functions, that would carry out my constructors. [read more]

virtual base classes in c++

Mateusz Małczak2007-02-21c++comments

ive written short piece of code... but it didnt worked. i must write this code down somewhere. im almost sure that next time i will have to deal with virtual inheritance in c++ i will make this mistake once again. lets take a look at this few lines of code : 

class A { ... }
class B : public virtual A 
{ 
 B( void ) : A( void ){ ... }
}
class C : public B 
{
 C( void ) : B(void ){ ... }
}
what is wrong ? ive asked myself
well... C class constructor should also invoke direct call to class A constructor. bleh... thats easy, isnt that... not for me hehe

1 , 2 , next (older)